
The Tibetan Buddhists say that spiritual masters whose students do not become better than them are failures. They do not offer any guidance for the student whose master mumbles inconsistently.
Several hours after posting yesterday's entry about my visions of red, I received an email from the Supreme Master of Mixing, Stefan, who politely pointed out that I had misinterpreted his teachings about ink. Adding Tanzanite to Supershow, he clarified, was a way of neutralizing the green in the latter with the red in the former. In other words, my original lesson at the feet of the wise one should have taught me that Supershow has a green hue, not a red one. But, Stefan went on to say, he had, in the light of my post, just performed an experiment using Tanzanite ink, a paper towel, and water. (This, as ink lovers will know, is a handy way to separate a colour out into its component parts.) And he had been rather shocked to see no trace of red in the Tanzanite. Here, for the record, is how his email ended: 'It is mostly a purple-blue, with traces of a light blue and perhaps even (dare I say it?) green. So it's really the purple that neutralizes the green in the... mumble mumble...'
Those are his actual mumblings, dear readers. What is a disciple to do when he discovers that he has a self-confessed mumbling master? To be fair to the wise one, he did also say in his email that he hadn't actually checked whether or not Supershow contains red, but I simply assumed that his mystical sixth sense was at work during his original pronouncement. (Don't actually check for the colour -- sense its presence, young disciple.)
This crisis has, of course, prompted me to think again about the vision of red that coloured my morning yesterday. Did I really see it in the lines of Supershow Blue, or was it merely a hallucinkation? Do I experience miraculous visions, or am I just delusional?
With these concerns in mind, I have just attempted a Stefan-style experiment with a large dot of Supershow, a paper towel, and a few drops of water. Now, I was constantly told off for not paying attention during Chemistry lessons in school (I fear that I may even, in a moment of high teenage angst, even have asked 'What does this have to do with art?' at one point), so I may have made a rudimentary error in the laboratory this evening. I can, however, discern no sign of red. All I can see, in fact, is, er, blue and a very vague hint of green. Does this mean that the Master was right all along, even if he now doubts his own judgement? And what about the red that I saw? It was there, I tell you. It spoke to me. You can take it as read.
Meanwhile, just to cause even more of a commotion on the deck of the Penquod, a message has arrived from another reader of Ink Quest. Let's call her Noelle, shall we, dear readers? She informs me that I should, if I like the red hue of Supershow Blue, try the legendary Parker Penman Sapphire, and she has generously offered to send a written sample. I have seen this glorious -- if somewhat controversial -- colour on a couple of occasions, but its present scarcity means that it is not one of the bottles stored in the hold of the Penquod. Should I take this message as confirmation that there is, contrary to my experiment and Stefan's original teachings, red in Supershow after all?
I no longer know what to believe. Everything has been thrown open to doubt. My visions are subject to revision. The opening lines of Bob Dylan's 'Visions of Johanna' come to mind:
Ain't it just like the night to play tricks when you're trying to be so quiet?
We sit here stranded, though we're all doing our best to deny it.
I cannot deny it: everywhere I turn lies a red herring.
Inks in use today: Noodler's Sequoia; Omas Sepia.








