
I have to ask: is ink a mask?
I've never wanted to be linked with a particular shade of ink. I've never wanted someone to see words written in a given shade and be given to think of me. Roland Barthes, my great hero, apparently used a certain blue with such regularity that those who knew him remember his presence whenever they see that ink. (Antoine Compagnon has written movingly about this, and Daria Galateria, in a charming little piece called 'Les couleurs du Neutre', can't help referring to the the blue ink in which the manuscript and index cards of Le Neutre are 'illuminées'.) I, by way of complete contrast, cannot commit myself to a single shade; monoginkmy constantly escapes me.
The notebook in which I'm writing these lines, for example, holds words that glow in something like sixteen different colours. And when I added an index card written in Mont Blanc Racing Green to the noticeboard outside my office today, I was struck by how its neighbour, which has been there since the beginning of the semester, was penned in an entirely colour (Herbin Café des Îles, to be precise).
I think that this constant shifting might be a form of masking, of masquerade. I came to this conclusion on the way home from work this evening when I sat down on the train and retrieved from my briefcase Exit Ghost, the new Philip Roth novel. Before I could sink back into the captivating tale of withdrawal from the world (we're told at one point that Zuckerman has been living in isolation 'all day with the alphabet'), disgust, and the usual Rothian misanthropy, I spotted coming towards me down the aisle of the carriage someone whom I very vaguely know. Even though we've never really said more than 'Hello' to each other, there was a terrible moment when I thought that I was going to be trapped in conversation instead of my book, but she passed on by with just a greeting. What Larry David, another hero of mine, calls the 'stop and chat' had been avoided.
As we were getting off the train to change to another, however, she came over and said 'I hope you didn't think I was being rude by not stopping'. 'Of course not', I replied. 'I was reading a book, so I was perfectly happy with "Hello"'. Worried that this was about to escalate into a 'stop and chat' about not having been drawn into a 'stop and chat', I decided to head quickly for the waiting room. As I approached its door, a man came out wearing a large Halloween mask. He whooped something and ran down the stairs towards the exit.
Once I'd got over my initial and habitual response of 'Must we have festivities?', I began to envy the wearer of the mask. If, I reasoned, I were to walk around all day wearing some kind of mask, no one would be able to corner me with a 'stop and chat'. I'd be as good as invisible. I could finally be free to be isolated and live all day with the alphabet.
I suspect, on further reflection, that my constant flitting from ink to ink is a form of masking. One of the things I dislike about handwriting is that it's usually seen as the unique sign of a particular individual. What the hand leaves upon the page is an index to the author. I'm not at all comfortable with the fact that people might come across something that I've written and, in the shape of the letters, find a link back to me. Writing should be, as Roland Barthes once put it, 'the destruction of every voice, of every point of origin'. I want to be masked and anonymous when I take up my pen.
Promiscuity at the level of ink is, I now suspect, an attempt to smudge the index, to erase the apparently insurmountable link between the written and the writer. I'm stuck with my handwriting, but I'm free to change the colour of my words from page to page. And perhaps the dramatic shift of shades is meant to be a distraction, a way of diverting attention.
The problem with masks, of course, is that people always want to know what's behind them. Bob Dylan, yet another of my great heroes, has spent over forty years trying to deflect attention away from himself by donning a series of metaphorical masks (the acoustic hobo, the electrified Beat, the born-again Christian, the cowboy, the star of a Victoria's Secrets advertisement, and so on). While I haven't yet had the chance to see it, Todd Haynes' new film, I'm Not There, would appear to be all about this restless multiplicity. But the problem for Dylan has always been that fans want to know what's behind the mask; they want to get beyond the masquerade to discover the real Robert Zimmerman. The masks, in other words, have made matters worse: they have merely intensified others' desire for the real thing.
But perhaps there's another way to think about masks. Long before Bob Dylan was born, and long before my ink quest began, a psychoanalyst named Joan Riviere wrote an essay entitled 'Womanliness as a Masquerade', in which she argued that femininity is a kind of mask that women often feel compelled to adopt in order to cope with the demands of patriarchal society. The part of the essay that's always intrigued me most is the paragraph where she writes the following:
The reader may now ask how I define womanliness or where I draw the line between genuine womanliness and the 'masquerade'. My suggestion, however, is not that there is any such difference; whether radical or superficial, they are the same thing.
There is, in other words, nothing hidden 'behind' the mask. The mask is all there is.
Why can't the same be true of ink? Why can't it be a mask that has nothing behind it? Forget about depth; remain at the level of the surface. Ink is all there is. All is ink. Beyond the colours, I'm not there.
Masks in use today: Mont Blanc Racing Green; Stefan's 'Black Rose'.
PS (1 November): I've now inserted a hotlink to a YouTube clip of the classic 'stop and chat' moment from Curb Your Enthusiasm. And those unfamiliar with the phenomenon of 'double-dipping' may wish to follow the newly added link in Sunday's post to the Great Costanza at the buffet table.





