
When it comes to paper, I've been through the mill.
The week in ink began badly. As I reported in a recent post, the Rhodia Webnotebook, while aesthetically pleasing, contains paper that is inkfinitely inkferior to that found in the regular Rhodia pads. I have put up with a bit of bleed-through and semi-feathering in recent weeks, however, because I like the way that my new acquisition feels and looks. Its striking orange cover reminds me of the colour of plastic that I imagine to have been used for seats on public transport in East Germany circa 1974. But I decided on Monday morning, when a hastily scribbled line turned into an utter mess on the shoddy paper, that enough was enough. What good is a collection of the world's finest inks if I don't have exquisite, smooth, reliable paper on which to write?
Having sulked for the whole of Monday, I paid a visit on Tuesday morning to Ryman in the centre of the city, for I had recently spotted in another branch of the stationery shop an intriguing possibility: a A5-sized, black, vaguely Moleskine-like sketchbook containing 110gsm paper and costing just £4.99. I soon found one of the pads on the shelves, but was a little disappointed to see that it was wrapped in plastic, which meant that I could not inspect the paper before making the purchase. Throwing caution to the wind, I asked one of the assistants if she could possibly remove the packaging so that I could open the book. I was expecting a contemptuous dismissal, but she willingly ripped off the plastic and allowed me to fondle the sheets.
Things looked good: the pages felt thick, friendly, and, crucially, devoid of the hideous waxy coating that makes Moleskine sketchbooks so infuriating for users of fountain pens. I handed over my card, put the book into my case, and strolled happily through the city to my office, serenading passers-by with Singin' in the Rain's 'Good Morning' as I went. After I had gone through the usual rituals at my desk (unpack the pens, switch on the kettle, prime a caffetière with French Roast), I removed the notebook from my briefcase and leaned back contentedly in my chair.
And then I smelled it: a curious chemical whiff. Mothball with a pinch of shoe factory. It was coming from the notebook. I pressed my nose to the faux-leather cover and inhaled. When I regained consciousness around fifteen minutes later, my nostrils were filled with the unpleasant scent. Nauseated, I attempted to negate the odour by sniffing my Acqua-di-Parma-scented wrist (perhaps the closest a modern gentleman can legitimately get to a posy). I felt a little better.
As a father of a seventeenth-month-old child, I am accustomed to breathing through my mouth during certain parental duties, so I decided to use my transferable skills and carry on my inspection of the notebook without using my nose. Whiff aside, things still looked promising: the elasticated strap (which, perhaps in an attempt to keep litigation from Moleskine at bay, runs horizontally across the covers) fitted nicely, the sheets appeared to have been bound firmly, and the little ribbon bookmark glistened gently in the light.
Still breathing only through my mouth, I picked up one of my pens and made my way over to the library. I had some references to chase up, so the notebook would be used for the very first time. As I entered the building, I happened to see honorary Penquod member Arty, who told me that he was busy 'weeding'. When I asked him what this meant in the context of a library, he informed me that certain texts that had not been borrowed for many years, or which have been made redundant by newer editions, were being removed from the shelves and placed on a table in the entrance of the library, from where people would be invited to help themselves. When he had finished explaining the activity of 'weeding' to me, he spotted the notebook in my hand and said that it looked rather appealing. Aware that Arty, as a Seinfeld fan, would have seen the episode where Jerry and Elaine discuss the curious smell of the Constanzas' house, I changed the subject quickly and, after chatting for a few minutes (during which time I kept the notebook as far away from him as possible), made my way upstairs.
When I had retrieved the books that I needed from the shelves, I settled down at a desk, found the first piece of information required, removed the cap from my Aurora Talentum, opened the sketchbook, and put nib to paper. I had high hopes. I thought that the odour emanating from the cover of the notebook would be cancelled out by the majestic performance of the paper. I thought that the ink would finally find a perfect home. I thought that I had discovered The One at last (and for only £4.99)
As usual, disappointment quickly set in. While not as vile as the paper found in the Rhodia Webnotebook, the sheets in the sketchbook are not very receptive to ink. If the nib is left in place on the surface for a moment, ink continues to be drawn from the nib, as if the paper has tissue-like qualities. This, of course, quickly leads to the dreaded bleed-through. Ink fact, even when a quick stroke is made, it's still possible to see the line on the other side of the page. (Isn't 110gsm substantial enough? Do I need to start demanding 2kg per square metre?)
I used the sketchbook once or twice after Tuesday, but by Thursday I had sunk into a state of utter despair concerning the general quality of paper. All I want is a sheet that loves ink, that lets a nib slide gracefully across it, that refuses to feather, that keeps what's written on one side hidden from the other. I had assembled a bonfire of my many inkompetent notebooks in my garden, and I was about to light the fuse ... when I heard the day's post being pushed through the letterbox. Something told me that salvation had come, and so I put the match back in the box and stepped inside the house.
Salvation had inkdeed arrived. Among the junk mail and writs from the estate of Lazlo Biro was a beautiful envelope adorned with the impossibly elegant handwriting of Michigan-based honorary Penquod crew member Gerry. Inside I found a letter written in a lovely blue ink (a vintage Quink?). Even more exquisite was the accompanying blank notecard bearing the handless clock that I displayed at the top of the previous entry of Ink Quest and, in the bottom left-hand corner, the enigmatic words 'Ricceri - Firenze'.
The card is simply too beautiful ever to use -- it's a work of art, in short -- and so I will never know precisely how it responds to ink. I know, however, that it would be the softest, most scinktillating writing experience of my life. But I also know that I would regret ruffling its blankness with words. What could I write? What would be beautiful enough? W.B. Yeats' 'He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven'? Dylan Thomas' 'Prologue'? Ginsberg's 'Kaddish'? Wallace Stevens' 'The Emperor of Ice-Cream'? (I am obsessed by the line 'Let be be finale of seem' for reasons entirely unknown to me.) Or would it simply be safer to stick with Johnny Mercer's lyrics for 'Too Marvelous for Words'?
But these are idle dreams; the perfect paper must, precisely because it is the perfect paper, remain untouched. I have tried to think of a way around this, a way to let ink have its way, but I just keep drawing a blank.
Ink in use today: Noodler's Lexington Gray; Private Reserve Naples Blue.







